What information can you see in the Reviewed Documents table?

The information provided in the Reviewed Documents table includes crucial details about each reviewer's actions regarding the documents in question. This encompasses the identity of the reviewer who coded each document, the duration the reviewer spent on coding, and the specific way each document was coded. This data is vital for assessing the effectiveness and consistency of the review process, as it allows for tracking and analysis of individual reviewer performance and decisions.

In contrast, the other options focus on different aspects of the review process. For instance, determining the number of documents needed to trigger an auto-refresh relates to system performance and functionality, rather than individual reviewer insights. Additionally, the Coverage Mode of the queue pertains to the operational settings rather than details about specific reviews. Lastly, while the Review Center Coding fields do provide information regarding original reviewer names and decisions, they do not encapsulate the full breadth of time taken by reviewers and their coding methods, which is encompassed in the correct option.