What kind of documents are typically excluded from review unless specified?

The correct answer pertains to the practice of managing documents during the review process in legal settings, especially in e-discovery. Family members of responsive documents, often referred to as "non-responsive" or "peripheral documents," are typically excluded from review unless there is a specific requirement to include them in the review process. This means that only the primary documents that contain pertinent information or evidence relevant to the case are usually prioritized.

Excluding family members helps streamline the review process, as it reduces the volume of documents that needs to be examined and allows for more efficient resource allocation. Family members may include duplicates, prior drafts, or communications that do not add significant value to the case. However, if a determination is made that these documents could provide contextual insights, they might be included based on case-specific needs.

The other options may involve considerations regarding document management but do not accurately reflect typical exclusions in routine review processes. For example, while documents from unrelated custodians or archived documents may be less likely to be reviewed in some instances, they are not universally excluded without specific context. High volumes of data might indeed pose challenges but do not inherently justify exclusion without further criteria.