Which action should be taken after changing the parameters of a review queue?

Changing the parameters of a review queue requires careful handling to ensure that the ongoing review process is not disrupted and that data integrity is maintained. Pausing the queue before making any changes reflects best practices in data management and workflow efficiency.

By pausing the queue, you prevent any simultaneous reviews from occurring while the parameters are being adjusted. This avoids issues such as inconsistent results or confusion among reviewers, as they may be working with outdated or incorrect parameters. Allowing for a brief pause ensures that all modifications can be made safely and that once the changes are implemented, the review process can resume smoothly with updated parameters.

Notifying the review team is valuable, but it is most effective to do this after making adjustments rather than interrupting their workflow. Documenting changes is also important but typically follows the action of pausing and adjusting parameters, serving as a record of what adjustments were made. Restarting the queue without pausing would not ensure the accuracy or clarity for any ongoing tasks and could lead to errors in the review process.